header-logo header-logo

27 October 2023 / Pauline Campbell
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

The dissolution of the courts

144119
It’s like the C16th revisited, writes Pauline Campbell, as court closures & marginalised victims take us back to the days of yore

Historian Robert Hutchinson described it as the ‘greatest single piece of privatisation in the history of governance’. The Dissolution of the Monasteries, occasionally referred to as the Suppression of the Monasteries, was the set of administrative and legal processes between 1536 and 1541 by which Henry VIII disbanded monasteries, priories, convents and friaries in England, Wales and Ireland, appropriated their income, disposed of their assets, and provided for their former personnel and functions. From 1535 to 1539, more than 15,000 nuns and monks were displaced and more than 500 monasteries supressed.

Although corruption allegations were made against the Catholic Church, it could not be denied that monasteries helped to feed the poor, took care of the sick, and provided education to boys in the local community. Therefore, although the Dissolution of the Monasteries doubled Henry VIII’s income and provided the finance required to fund his war against France, as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll