header-logo header-logo

27 October 2023 / Pauline Campbell
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

The dissolution of the courts

144119
It’s like the C16th revisited, writes Pauline Campbell, as court closures & marginalised victims take us back to the days of yore

Historian Robert Hutchinson described it as the ‘greatest single piece of privatisation in the history of governance’. The Dissolution of the Monasteries, occasionally referred to as the Suppression of the Monasteries, was the set of administrative and legal processes between 1536 and 1541 by which Henry VIII disbanded monasteries, priories, convents and friaries in England, Wales and Ireland, appropriated their income, disposed of their assets, and provided for their former personnel and functions. From 1535 to 1539, more than 15,000 nuns and monks were displaced and more than 500 monasteries supressed.

Although corruption allegations were made against the Catholic Church, it could not be denied that monasteries helped to feed the poor, took care of the sick, and provided education to boys in the local community. Therefore, although the Dissolution of the Monasteries doubled Henry VIII’s income and provided the finance required to fund his war against France, as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll