header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The ethics of AI

Lawyers have been asked for their views on the first piece of regulatory guidance on artificial intelligence (AI)

The guidance, ‘Explaining decisions made with AI’, was launched last week by the Information Commissioners’ Office (ICO) and the Alan Turing Institute. It attempts to tackle the legal and ethical pitfalls around the decision-making process in AI by laying out four key principles. These are: be transparent, be accountable, consider context and reflect on impacts.

Simon McDougall, executive director for technology, policy and innovation, ICO, said: ‘Our draft guidance goes into detail about different types of explanations, how to extract explanations of the logic used by the system to make a decision, and how to deliver explanations to the people they are about. It also outlines different types of explanation and emphasises the importance of using inherently explainable AI systems.’

The consultation is available to view on the ICO website, and ends on 24 January. A final version of the guidance will be published later in 2020.

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll