header-logo header-logo

25 February 2019
Issue: 7830 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Brexit , Technology
printer mail-detail

The EU copyright furore

EU governments last week endorsed the final text of the controversial European Copyright Directive, which would hold platforms such as YouTube, Google and SoundCloud responsible if users upload copyright-protected material.

MEPs will vote next month on whether the final version of the directive becomes law. The reform aims to make copyright law fit for the digital era—the EU’s most recent copyright laws date back to 2001. However, the proposed directive has been hotly contested even though extra safeguards and exceptions have been added. Notably, opponents argue say the Art 13 requirement to license material in case users upload it is impossible to fulfil and would curb freedom of expression.

Zoey Forbes, associate in technology, media and entertainment at Harbottle & Lewis, said: ‘Under the new rules, rights-holders will receive additional revenues from the use of their works online as well as greater protection from online copyright infringement.

‘However, as with all things, the devil is in the detail and some may feel the safeguards offered to the tech industry have not only watered down the EU’s original objectives but will actually leave certain rights-holders worse off. Conversely, the tech industry and those advocating for freedom of expression are unlikely to be appeased by these safeguards and will probably continue to oppose the directive on an ideological level.

‘At the same time, the Brexit factor may come in to play for those operating in the UK, who will not necessarily be obliged to follow the new rules if the UK either leaves the EU without a deal or the directive is not implemented by the time the UK leaves.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll