header-logo header-logo

25 February 2019
Issue: 7830 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Brexit , Technology
printer mail-detail

The EU copyright furore

EU governments last week endorsed the final text of the controversial European Copyright Directive, which would hold platforms such as YouTube, Google and SoundCloud responsible if users upload copyright-protected material.

MEPs will vote next month on whether the final version of the directive becomes law. The reform aims to make copyright law fit for the digital era—the EU’s most recent copyright laws date back to 2001. However, the proposed directive has been hotly contested even though extra safeguards and exceptions have been added. Notably, opponents argue say the Art 13 requirement to license material in case users upload it is impossible to fulfil and would curb freedom of expression.

Zoey Forbes, associate in technology, media and entertainment at Harbottle & Lewis, said: ‘Under the new rules, rights-holders will receive additional revenues from the use of their works online as well as greater protection from online copyright infringement.

‘However, as with all things, the devil is in the detail and some may feel the safeguards offered to the tech industry have not only watered down the EU’s original objectives but will actually leave certain rights-holders worse off. Conversely, the tech industry and those advocating for freedom of expression are unlikely to be appeased by these safeguards and will probably continue to oppose the directive on an ideological level.

‘At the same time, the Brexit factor may come in to play for those operating in the UK, who will not necessarily be obliged to follow the new rules if the UK either leaves the EU without a deal or the directive is not implemented by the time the UK leaves.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll