header-logo header-logo

The EU copyright furore

25 February 2019
Issue: 7830 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Brexit , Technology
printer mail-detail

EU governments last week endorsed the final text of the controversial European Copyright Directive, which would hold platforms such as YouTube, Google and SoundCloud responsible if users upload copyright-protected material.

MEPs will vote next month on whether the final version of the directive becomes law. The reform aims to make copyright law fit for the digital era—the EU’s most recent copyright laws date back to 2001. However, the proposed directive has been hotly contested even though extra safeguards and exceptions have been added. Notably, opponents argue say the Art 13 requirement to license material in case users upload it is impossible to fulfil and would curb freedom of expression.

Zoey Forbes, associate in technology, media and entertainment at Harbottle & Lewis, said: ‘Under the new rules, rights-holders will receive additional revenues from the use of their works online as well as greater protection from online copyright infringement.

‘However, as with all things, the devil is in the detail and some may feel the safeguards offered to the tech industry have not only watered down the EU’s original objectives but will actually leave certain rights-holders worse off. Conversely, the tech industry and those advocating for freedom of expression are unlikely to be appeased by these safeguards and will probably continue to oppose the directive on an ideological level.

‘At the same time, the Brexit factor may come in to play for those operating in the UK, who will not necessarily be obliged to follow the new rules if the UK either leaves the EU without a deal or the directive is not implemented by the time the UK leaves.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll