header-logo header-logo

Avoiding strike-off for dishonesty: the exception, not the norm

127510
When does dishonest conduct in the solicitors’ profession not lead to strike-off? Jessica Clay & Lucinda Soon consider some exceptional circumstances
  • Save in exceptional circumstances, a finding of dishonesty will lead to a solicitor being struck off the roll.
  • If exceptional circumstances are found, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal will however consider issuing a less severe sanction.
  • What amounts to exceptional circumstances will vary on a case-by-case basis, but will ultimately depend on the nature, scope and extent of the dishonesty.

Where a solicitor is found to have acted dishonestly, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) will invariably order that the solicitor is struck off from the roll (see for example Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 and Salsbury v Law Society [2008] EWCA Civ 1285, [2008] All ER (D) 240 (Nov)).

However, this general rule is not always applied and, in some cases, the SDT has found allegations of dishonesty proved but has nonetheless reasoned that a strike-off

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll