23 June 2023 / Jessica Clay , Lucinda Soon

Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory , Mental health , Professional negligence

Avoiding strike-off for dishonesty: the exception, not the norm

When does dishonest conduct in the solicitors’ profession not lead to strike-off? Jessica Clay & Lucinda Soon consider some exceptional circumstances

Save in exceptional circumstances, a finding of dishonesty will lead to a solicitor being struck off the roll.
If exceptional circumstances are found, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal will however consider issuing a less severe sanction.
What amounts to exceptional circumstances will vary on a case-by-case basis, but will ultimately depend on the nature, scope and extent of the dishonesty.

Where a solicitor is found to have acted dishonestly, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) will invariably order that the solicitor is struck off from the roll (see for example Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 and Salsbury v Law Society [2008] EWCA Civ 1285, [2008] All ER (D) 240 (Nov)).

However, this general rule is not always applied and, in some cases, the SDT has found allegations of dishonesty proved but has nonetheless reasoned that a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Avoiding strike-off for dishonesty: the exception, not the norm

When does dishonest conduct in the solicitors’ profession not lead to strike-off? Jessica Clay & Lucinda Soon consider some exceptional circumstances

Save in exceptional circumstances, a finding of dishonesty will lead to a solicitor being struck off the roll.
If exceptional circumstances are found, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal will however consider issuing a less severe sanction.
What amounts to exceptional circumstances will vary on a case-by-case basis, but will ultimately depend on the nature, scope and extent of the dishonesty.

However, this general rule is not always applied and, in some cases, the SDT has found allegations of dishonesty proved but has nonetheless reasoned that a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

Error message

Avoiding strike-off for dishonesty: the exception, not the norm

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

DWF—Ian Plumley