header-logo header-logo

Avoiding strike-off for dishonesty: the exception, not the norm

127510
When does dishonest conduct in the solicitors’ profession not lead to strike-off? Jessica Clay & Lucinda Soon consider some exceptional circumstances
  • Save in exceptional circumstances, a finding of dishonesty will lead to a solicitor being struck off the roll.
  • If exceptional circumstances are found, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal will however consider issuing a less severe sanction.
  • What amounts to exceptional circumstances will vary on a case-by-case basis, but will ultimately depend on the nature, scope and extent of the dishonesty.

Where a solicitor is found to have acted dishonestly, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) will invariably order that the solicitor is struck off from the roll (see for example Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486 and Salsbury v Law Society [2008] EWCA Civ 1285, [2008] All ER (D) 240 (Nov)).

However, this general rule is not always applied and, in some cases, the SDT has found allegations of dishonesty proved but has nonetheless reasoned that a strike-off

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll