header-logo header-logo

The future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

07 March 2025 / Jessica Boxford , Joseph Evans , Cassidy Fan
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Features , Insolvency , Technology , Crypto , Property
printer mail-detail
210368
The definition of ‘property’ is about to expand: Jessica Boxford, Joseph Evans & Cassidy Fan explore the impact on insolvency practitioners
  • The Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill will widen the definition of ‘property’ in general law. This means officeholders can, with increased certainty, exercise their statutory powers over digital and unconventional assets.
  • The Bill also introduces additional costs and complexities due to the highly diverse and evolving nature of digital assets.

The new Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill introduced into Parliament on 11 September 2024 will widen the definition of ‘property’ in general law. This article considers the impact of the Bill on the law relating to insolvency.

The Bill will expand what property constitutes the insolvent estate. This means officeholders can, with increased certainty, exercise their statutory powers under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) over digital and unconventional assets. This could potentially mean those assets could be realised, and creditors could receive a larger dividend from the distribution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll