header-logo header-logo

The future of parole in the UK—planning for failure?

10 June 2022 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
84233
Alec Samuels dissects the recent JUSTICE parole system report by Professor Nicola Padfield QC
  • The parole system is not working efficiently; there is a high percentage of prisoners on recall and a lack of legal assistance available.
  • The government’s involvement in the parole system.

All is not well with parole. The system has low visibility, is inadequately staffed and funded, and is not well regulated. Many institutions and people are involved: prison service, probation, police, lawyers (sometimes), criminologists, psychiatrists, victims, and of course the prisoners. The dossiers prepared on the prisoner leave much to be desired—there are unfortunate delays in keeping appointments, the hearings are an uneasy mixture of the formal and the informal, victims are little involved, legal assistance is lacking, little information, advice and assistance is available for the prisoner, training and support in prison is inadequate, and opportunities outside on release are inadequate.

Perhaps it is not surprising that 14% of prisoners are on recall, having been released on licence but then brought

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll