header-logo header-logo

07 November 2025 / Sailesh Mehta , Theo Burges
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Features , Criminal , National security , Media , Data protection , Privacy
printer mail-detail

The hydra grows another head

235046
The Afghan leak super-injunction highlights the growing body of national security law spanning ever-increasing areas of practice, write Sailesh Mehta & Theo Burges
  • The increasing volume of national security cases and legal matters involving national security reflects heightened global and domestic concerns.
  • The diverse nature of national security work means a wide range of responsibilities and disciplines are involved, from intelligence and cybersecurity to counterterrorism and enforcement.
  • The evolving national security legal framework is adapting to new threats, technologies and geopolitical shifts.

In July of this year, Mr Justice Chamberlain discharged a super-injunction designed to prevent the reporting of a 2022 leak which put the lives of Afghans who co-operated with the UK in Afghanistan and their families at risk. In August, astoundingly, there was a further data breach in relation to British engagement in Afghanistan. The injunction was primarily granted due to concerns regarding threats to the lives of those connected to the leak, but it also later became clear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll