header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 July 2023 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , International justice
printer mail-detail

The individual under international criminal law (Pt 1)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
130190
In the first of a two-part series, Simon Parsons charts the development of individual liability for international crimes
  • Prior to 1945, there was little evidence that crimes against peace and crimes against humanity had crystallised as international crimes as part of customary international law.
  • The Nuremberg trials laid the foundations of modern international criminal law based on individual criminal responsibility.

This article explores the lack of individual liability for international crime up until 1945. It is noted that the Nuremberg war crime trials of leading Nazi officials laid the groundwork for personal international criminal liability for a criminal war, and for the international criminal justice process in which those responsible for such a war are held responsible. It is hoped, one day, this same process may be applied against the major war criminal Vladimir Putin and his subordinates.

International criminal law pre-1945

The evidence for individual criminal liability for international crime in this period is limited. However, the conviction of Peter von Hagenbach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll