header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 July 2023 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , International justice
printer mail-detail

The individual under international criminal law (Pt 1)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
130190
In the first of a two-part series, Simon Parsons charts the development of individual liability for international crimes
  • Prior to 1945, there was little evidence that crimes against peace and crimes against humanity had crystallised as international crimes as part of customary international law.
  • The Nuremberg trials laid the foundations of modern international criminal law based on individual criminal responsibility.

This article explores the lack of individual liability for international crime up until 1945. It is noted that the Nuremberg war crime trials of leading Nazi officials laid the groundwork for personal international criminal liability for a criminal war, and for the international criminal justice process in which those responsible for such a war are held responsible. It is hoped, one day, this same process may be applied against the major war criminal Vladimir Putin and his subordinates.

International criminal law pre-1945

The evidence for individual criminal liability for international crime in this period is limited. However, the conviction of Peter von Hagenbach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll