header-logo header-logo

The insider: 6 June 2025

221403
More oi oi than AI: Dominic Regan on fake citations, succinct judgments & bewildering costs

On the day before his birthday, Sir Andrew Ritchie heard and gave judgment in the bizarre case of R (on the application of Frederick Ayinde) v Haringey London Borough Council [2025] EWHC 1040 (Admin). I have no doubt that reams will be dedicated to this matter, but nevertheless I want to make a few comments.

This is the infamous judicial review in which no less than five fake authorities were cited to the defendant and the High Court. There is no accepted explanation as to where these cases originated. Who or what created them? The finger is pointed at artificial intelligence (AI). No one should ever be citing authorities without first checking their provenance. Dare I say it is also a mighty good idea to read them? No matter how brilliant the headnote, there is no substitute for reading the entire decision within which there might just be buried treasure. The seminal authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll