header-logo header-logo

The Lugano Convention: a good first step

05 March 2020 / David Greene
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail
16966
David Greene commends the government’s commitment to Lugano & hopes that similar good sense will prevail in the EU
  • Importance of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention.
  • The introduction of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill.

If there is a litigation god he might come in the form of Michael Gove, at least in the short term, through the prism of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention. Many may be surprised to hear that this was not in any way a given. Despite earlier commitments it was entirely possible that Lugano might have, through perception, been washed up in the government’s red line against any continuing influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). There appeared to be, in certain government circles, the misperception that the CJEU has a direct influence on domestic law through the mechanisms of the Lugano Convention. Further there seemed a suspicion that Lugano is an instrument through which the EU drives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll