header-logo header-logo

The new rules of transparency

238285
Reforms to open justice mean parties will need to be proactive, writes Antonia Glover
  • The new Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives set out a framework for widespread reform of the rules around public access to court and tribunal hearings, making it easier for non-parties to access documents filed in court proceedings and court hearings.
  • The exact rule changes will be developed by individual courts and tribunals. The High Court has already announced changes to its rules around access to court documents, expected to come into force in January 2026.
  • Litigants need to be aware that court proceedings are set to become much more public. Any applications to derogate from open justice principles will need to be carefully justified.

In April 2024, the Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales announced a new Transparency and Open Justice Board to spearhead reform of the court and tribunal system. In July 2025, the board released its finalised key objectives, setting out the principles of a reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll