header-logo header-logo

The Partnership: Enquiry Explorer

28 July 2021
Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing , Profession
printer mail-detail
Property law firm The Partnership has launched conveyancing technology, Enquiry Explorer

It gives sellers access to the questions being asked so they can answer them directly and see the responses given by their lawyers. Buyers can ask questions themselves and track their progress.

Peter Ambrose, managing director of The Partnership, said: ‘Enquiry handling is the black hole of conveyancing. The process is totally opaque – clients and agents don’t know what’s going on and it’s extremely painful for lawyers. For the first time ever, Enquiry Explorer allows everyone to obtain up to date progress of the most confusing part of conveyancing.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll