header-logo header-logo

09 January 2026 / Joanna Newton
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Family , Pensions , Divorce , Equality
printer mail-detail

The pension split

239519
The humble pension sharing order is 25 years old: if you’re not celebrating, you should be, says Joanna Newton
  • A discussion of pension sharing orders (PSOs) and the role pensions play in financial remedy.
  • Explains why PSOs are underused, and highlights the importance of ensuring clients understand their short, medium and long-term financial considerations.

Twenty-five years of pension sharing orders (PSOs) is unlikely to be marked on many calendars. Nevertheless, the recent anniversary of the first order to be issued should not go unnoticed, primarily as an opportunity to highlight their value in ensuring long-term financial security for divorcees.

What are PSOs?

Pension sharing orders are sub-orders made within a financial consent order as part of financial remedy proceedings upon divorce. They essentially do what they say on the tin: they enable the sharing of a portion of one party’s pension with the other party to ensure a fair split of the matrimonial assets upon divorce.

PSOs will identify how much pension is to be transferred to the receiving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll