header-logo header-logo

The Procurement Act—substantial progress or missed opportunity? Pt 2

10 November 2023 / Fleur Turrington , Jennifer Clarke , Aimee Cook
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Procurement
printer mail-detail
145979
Fleur Turrington, Jennifer Clarke & Aimee Cook believe the new Act represents an opportunity for increased transparency
  • The Procurement Act 2023 received Royal Assent in October, with an implementation period expected before coming into force in October 2024.
  • A key principle that remains within the Act is that contracts under the competitive tender procedure are to be awarded in line with the ‘most advantageous tender’ and not those that are simply the most economically attractive to contracting authorities.

The Procurement Act 2023, which received Royal Assent in October, introduces the concept of a centrally managed debarment register. This will comprise a list of suppliers to be excluded from competing for public contracts. Suppliers will only be excluded following ministerial investigation and there is a right for the supplier to challenge exclusion within the debarment standstill period of eight working days of the decision to exclude.

Ministers will also have powers of review where they believe a contracting authority may unknowingly award

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll