header-logo header-logo

The Procurement Act—substantial progress or missed opportunity? Pt 2

10 November 2023 / Fleur Turrington , Jennifer Clarke , Aimee Cook
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Procurement
printer mail-detail
145979
Fleur Turrington, Jennifer Clarke & Aimee Cook believe the new Act represents an opportunity for increased transparency
  • The Procurement Act 2023 received Royal Assent in October, with an implementation period expected before coming into force in October 2024.
  • A key principle that remains within the Act is that contracts under the competitive tender procedure are to be awarded in line with the ‘most advantageous tender’ and not those that are simply the most economically attractive to contracting authorities.

The Procurement Act 2023, which received Royal Assent in October, introduces the concept of a centrally managed debarment register. This will comprise a list of suppliers to be excluded from competing for public contracts. Suppliers will only be excluded following ministerial investigation and there is a right for the supplier to challenge exclusion within the debarment standstill period of eight working days of the decision to exclude.

Ministers will also have powers of review where they believe a contracting authority may unknowingly award

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll