header-logo header-logo

07 February 2025 / Jack Ridgway
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The right person for the job

207246
Would you ask a bricklayer to install a boiler, asks Jack Ridgway? If not, you should probably get a regulated costs lawyer to manage your costs
  • The perils of using an unregulated costs draftsman were laid bare in Kapoor (deceased) v Johal [2024] EWHC 2853 (SCCO).

The importance of specialism can be found in a simple rhetorical question: would you instruct a bricklayer to install a new boiler?

Specialism and regulation are not marketing gimmicks but a cornerstone of public trust in the legal profession. So why do some solicitors continue to instruct unregulated costs draftsman, instead of qualified and regulated costs lawyers?

Not a trifling thing

There is no evidence that unregulated draftsmen are cheaper or provide a higher quality of work. Indeed, they are limited to acting as agents for the solicitor and cannot go on the record for the receiving party. A bill of costs is not a trifling thing, and errors are not of no consequence. A finding that a bill

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll