header-logo header-logo

21 February 2019 / Andrew Wilkinson
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

The rise of the (probate) machine

Andrew Wilkinson considers the pros & cons of embracing 21st century technology

  • The Probate Registry now accepts online probate applications, following a successful trial in 2017.
  • But what has finally dragged the Probate Registry into the 21st century? And what does it mean for solicitors? Moreover, is it a sign of more to come?

The probate process usually involves the swearing of the oath, which means an appointment with another solicitor (or commission for oaths). You pay the fee (typically £7), recite some fairly undecipherable wording with your hand on the Bible (or alternative religious book). The solicitor signs and stamps their details, and the documents get sent off to the post. But not for much longer. The Probate Registry has realised that the swearing of oaths is an archaic and quite frankly pointless process, only serving to give solicitors a greater sense of their own importance. Instead, the Probate Registry now allows documents to be verified by a statement of truth—a simple acknowledgement that the document is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll