header-logo header-logo

The rise of the (probate) machine

21 February 2019 / Andrew Wilkinson
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Andrew Wilkinson considers the pros & cons of embracing 21st century technology

  • The Probate Registry now accepts online probate applications, following a successful trial in 2017.
  • But what has finally dragged the Probate Registry into the 21st century? And what does it mean for solicitors? Moreover, is it a sign of more to come?

The probate process usually involves the swearing of the oath, which means an appointment with another solicitor (or commission for oaths). You pay the fee (typically £7), recite some fairly undecipherable wording with your hand on the Bible (or alternative religious book). The solicitor signs and stamps their details, and the documents get sent off to the post. But not for much longer. The Probate Registry has realised that the swearing of oaths is an archaic and quite frankly pointless process, only serving to give solicitors a greater sense of their own importance. Instead, the Probate Registry now allows documents to be verified by a statement of truth—a simple acknowledgement that the document is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll