header-logo header-logo

The rise of the (probate) machine

21 February 2019 / Andrew Wilkinson
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Andrew Wilkinson considers the pros & cons of embracing 21st century technology

  • The Probate Registry now accepts online probate applications, following a successful trial in 2017.
  • But what has finally dragged the Probate Registry into the 21st century? And what does it mean for solicitors? Moreover, is it a sign of more to come?

The probate process usually involves the swearing of the oath, which means an appointment with another solicitor (or commission for oaths). You pay the fee (typically £7), recite some fairly undecipherable wording with your hand on the Bible (or alternative religious book). The solicitor signs and stamps their details, and the documents get sent off to the post. But not for much longer. The Probate Registry has realised that the swearing of oaths is an archaic and quite frankly pointless process, only serving to give solicitors a greater sense of their own importance. Instead, the Probate Registry now allows documents to be verified by a statement of truth—a simple acknowledgement that the document is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll