header-logo header-logo

The rise of the (probate) machine

21 February 2019 / Andrew Wilkinson
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Andrew Wilkinson considers the pros & cons of embracing 21st century technology

  • The Probate Registry now accepts online probate applications, following a successful trial in 2017.
  • But what has finally dragged the Probate Registry into the 21st century? And what does it mean for solicitors? Moreover, is it a sign of more to come?

The probate process usually involves the swearing of the oath, which means an appointment with another solicitor (or commission for oaths). You pay the fee (typically £7), recite some fairly undecipherable wording with your hand on the Bible (or alternative religious book). The solicitor signs and stamps their details, and the documents get sent off to the post. But not for much longer. The Probate Registry has realised that the swearing of oaths is an archaic and quite frankly pointless process, only serving to give solicitors a greater sense of their own importance. Instead, the Probate Registry now allows documents to be verified by a statement of truth—a simple acknowledgement that the document is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll