header-logo header-logo

The Singapore Convention on Mediation: what next?

21 April 2023 / Henrietta Jackson-Stops , Rebecca Attree
Issue: 8021 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR , International
printer mail-detail
119085
The UK is to become a party to the Singapore Convention on Mediation—what does this mean? Henrietta Jackson-Stops & Rebecca Attree set out next steps & implications
  • The UK will soon be a party to the Singapore Convention on Mediation, which provides for direct enforcement of cross-border settlement agreements between parties resulting from mediation.
  • The UK government hopes the Convention will bring confidence that there is a clear process for resolving issues in international disputes, although there are some concerns that it may bring additional unwanted legality to the process.

On 2 March 2023, the UK government announced that it was to become a party to the Singapore Convention and that the UK will sign the Convention as soon as possible. This news has generated some press coverage and excitement among the mediation community, but what does it mean?

What is the Singapore Convention?

The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements resulting from Mediation (the ‘Singapore Convention’) was adopted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll