header-logo header-logo

12 April 2024 / Chris Gaunt , Caroline Styan
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Profession , Tax , Property
printer mail-detail

The Spring Budget & the property market

167812
The Spring Budget brought several tweaks to property taxation & CGT, which are likely to impact the wider real estate market, write Chris Gaunt & Caroline Styan

With his Spring Budget last month, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced significant changes to the way the government will tax property, as well as to capital gains tax (CGT). These are likely to have wider ramifications throughout the real estate market. Below, we set out the main adjustments, as well as providing insight on their expected impact.

Capital gains tax

CGT in the higher tax band is to decrease from 28% to 24% from 6 April 2024. The lower rate will remain at 18%. This measure is applied to disposals of residential properties which are not an individual’s primary residence. Private residence relief (PRR) will continue to apply on disposals of main residences.

According to the government’s policy paper ‘Capital gains tax rate on disposals of residential property from 6 April 2024’, cutting the rate of CGT ‘is expected

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll