header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Kate Bridgland , Oliver Cooke , Richard Marshall
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The UK financial crime regime: fit for purpose? (Pt 2)

136509
A cunning (economic crime) plan? Kate Bridgland, Oliver Cooke & Richard Marshall turn their attention to the government’s proposals for tackling money laundering & fraud
  • The Economic Crime Plan 2 represents a robust and necessary commitment to combatting economic crime.
  • Sensible measures are proposed, but the proof will be in the metaphorical pudding.

The UK government has committed to robustly combatting economic crime. This commitment takes the shape of the catchily-titled Economic Crime Plan 2: 2023–2026 (the plan), which seeks to build on the first Economic Crime Plan 2019–2022 (the 2019 plan).

Due to a long period in which economic crime has not received the attention from law enforcement agencies that it arguably should have done, it is perhaps unsurprising that the growth of economic crime has continued largely unabated: £100bn is potentially laundered through and within the UK or UK-registered corporate structures each year. The plan aims to develop an improved end-to-end response to tackle money laundering, from limiting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll