header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 January 2021 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7915 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The UK Internal Market Bill: Yea for the House of Lords

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
34762
Michael Zander on the last stages of the UK Internal Market Bill

The parliamentary debates on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill came to a surprising harmonious ending on the evening of Tuesday 15 December.

The purpose of the Bill, as its title indicates, is to regulate the UK single market after the ending of the Brexit transition period. Most of the many hours both Houses spent debating the Bill were devoted to two topics. One was Part 5 of the Bill with its notorious clauses 44, 45 and 47 allowing ministers to issue regulations that the Government admitted would be in breach of international law. Part 5 of the Bill provoked uproar.

On November 9, the House of Lords, led by former Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, voted to remove the whole of Part 5 by the crushing majority of 433 to 165. The 44 Conservative peers who voted against the Government included the Party’s former Leader, Lord Howard of Lympne,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll