header-logo header-logo

20 June 2013 / Siobhan Jones , Caroline Shea KC
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Things aren’t always what they seem

157439656

When is an undertaking not an undertaking, ask Caroline Shea & Siobhan Jones

Undertakings make the legal world go round. Giving an undertaking to the court is a very serious matter, involving a party entering into a direct relationship with the court under which any conduct inconsistent with the undertaking is subject to the court’s discipline.

So weighty is the stuff of an undertaking that its breach is automatically characterised as a contempt of court, and so grievously is such conduct regarded that sanctions lie not merely in fines, but, if the contempt is serious enough and/or remains unpurged, in imprisonment.

Thus it is that both lawyers and the court go to great lengths to explain to the party offering the undertaking the nature of the obligation, and the consequences of breach. And thus it was that when Mr Salih, a business tenant of a fish and chip shop in Kent, gave his undertaking to the Dartford County Court in June 2007, the seriousness of the promise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll