header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / Tom Epps
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Thinking the unthinkable

Tom Epps reflects on how new powers in the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act are likely to impact on investigations

At a recent conference the Attorney General set out the government strategy to combat fraud. He said:

“Fraud harms us all. Recent research shows that in monetary terms the harm it causes is on par with class A drugs—around £330 per man, woman and child in the country. Fraud is a serious threat to the UK and tackling it requires partnership—prosecutors, police and other investigators, the private sector, local authorities and government working together.”

Lord Goldsmith omitted to state that the prosecution and accomplices in fraud cases may now form a partnership of sorts to tackle crime.
It is envisaged by those investigating fraud cases that accomplices will increasingly be used to provide evidence against their co-defendants and to assist from the early stages of the investigation to point the investigators towards evidence that may be helpful to the investigating team. Immunity from prosecution for accomplices was placed on a statutory footing on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll