header-logo header-logo

Thinking the unthinkable

31 May 2007 / Tom Epps
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Tom Epps reflects on how new powers in the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act are likely to impact on investigations

At a recent conference the Attorney General set out the government strategy to combat fraud. He said:

“Fraud harms us all. Recent research shows that in monetary terms the harm it causes is on par with class A drugs—around £330 per man, woman and child in the country. Fraud is a serious threat to the UK and tackling it requires partnership—prosecutors, police and other investigators, the private sector, local authorities and government working together.”

Lord Goldsmith omitted to state that the prosecution and accomplices in fraud cases may now form a partnership of sorts to tackle crime.
It is envisaged by those investigating fraud cases that accomplices will increasingly be used to provide evidence against their co-defendants and to assist from the early stages of the investigation to point the investigators towards evidence that may be helpful to the investigating team. Immunity from prosecution for accomplices was placed on a statutory footing on 1

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll