header-logo header-logo

Thumbs up for Safe Harbor replacement

06 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The EU-US Privacy Shield Framework—the replacement for Safe Harbor—provides an “essentially equivalent” level of protection for personal data, a report by Hogan Lovells has found.

Safe Harbor, which governed the exchange of personal data across the Atlantic, was declared invalid by the European Court of Justice in October 2015, creating anxiety for many commercial businesses who rely on the transfer of data. The Shield was conceived in February as a replacement for Safe Harbor by the European Commission and US Department of Commerce.

Hogan Lovell’s report, Legal Analysis of the EU-US Privacy Shield, found that the framework substantially meets the criteria for adequacy under Art 25(6) of the data protection Directive.

Eduardo Ustaran, partner at Hogan Lovells, and lead author of the report, says: "The Privacy Shield is crucial in bridging the gap between European and American approaches to privacy and it is therefore essential that it can be relied upon with complete certainty.

"Given the pressures to ensure that personal data transferred from the EU to the US is protected in accordance with European standards, the Privacy Shield will be subject to strict scrutiny by regulators and the courts as it becomes an established framework for compliance. Accordingly, assessing and determining the robustness and legal validity of the Privacy Shield is a business and political necessity."

The Privacy Shield is not yet in effect. It is currently under review by an EU working party, which will deliver its opinion in the coming weeks. The European Commission will then formally vote on it.

Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll