header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 December 2011 / Amy Taylor
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , EU , Family
printer mail-detail

The ties that bind

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Amy Taylor predicts the effect of the EC Maintenance Regulation on the courts in England & Wales

Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, (the Maintenance Regulation) came into force in June, replacing Brussels I. The Maintenance Regulation has been implemented in England and Wales through the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Maintenance) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1484).

The basic premise behind the Maintenance Regulation is simple: to do away with the necessity for any formalities in respect of the enforcement of decisions regarding maintenance within the EU, thereby making it both easier and cheaper for a maintenance creditor to enforce an award within EU member states. The simplicity of this concept is, however, belied by the finer details of the Maintenance Regulation and the (potentially dramatic) impact it could have upon financial proceedings involving EU member states.

Defining maintenance

Perhaps the first point which needs to be addressed when considering the Maintenance Regulation is the definition of maintenance itself. Unfortunately, no definition is provided in the body of the legislation. It is therefore necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll