header-logo header-logo

The ties that bind

02 December 2011 / Amy Taylor
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , EU , Family
printer mail-detail

Amy Taylor predicts the effect of the EC Maintenance Regulation on the courts in England & Wales

Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, (the Maintenance Regulation) came into force in June, replacing Brussels I. The Maintenance Regulation has been implemented in England and Wales through the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Maintenance) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1484).

The basic premise behind the Maintenance Regulation is simple: to do away with the necessity for any formalities in respect of the enforcement of decisions regarding maintenance within the EU, thereby making it both easier and cheaper for a maintenance creditor to enforce an award within EU member states. The simplicity of this concept is, however, belied by the finer details of the Maintenance Regulation and the (potentially dramatic) impact it could have upon financial proceedings involving EU member states.

Defining maintenance

Perhaps the first point which needs to be addressed when considering the Maintenance Regulation is the definition of maintenance itself. Unfortunately, no definition is provided in the body of the legislation. It is therefore necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll