header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The ties that bind

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
02 December 2011 / Amy Taylor
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , EU , Family
printer mail-detail

Amy Taylor predicts the effect of the EC Maintenance Regulation on the courts in England & Wales

Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, (the Maintenance Regulation) came into force in June, replacing Brussels I. The Maintenance Regulation has been implemented in England and Wales through the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Maintenance) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1484).

The basic premise behind the Maintenance Regulation is simple: to do away with the necessity for any formalities in respect of the enforcement of decisions regarding maintenance within the EU, thereby making it both easier and cheaper for a maintenance creditor to enforce an award within EU member states. The simplicity of this concept is, however, belied by the finer details of the Maintenance Regulation and the (potentially dramatic) impact it could have upon financial proceedings involving EU member states.

Defining maintenance

Perhaps the first point which needs to be addressed when considering the Maintenance Regulation is the definition of maintenance itself. Unfortunately, no definition is provided in the body of the legislation. It is therefore necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: AI boom collides with courtroom reality
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll