header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 April 2007 / Katherine Dunseath , Richard Macrory
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Time to act

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Should the UK be taxing aviation fuel, asks Katherine Dunseath and Richard Macrory

Aviation fuel is currently not taxed. Many have argued that taxation should be introduced as part of the policy response to climate change, but equally it is said that this is not something the UK could do on its own because of international legal constraints. Governments and industry sometimes disguise policy reluctance with the cloak of legal difficulties, and it is therefore important to unravel what a country such as the UK can or cannot do as a matter of law. It does not necessarily follow that aviation fuel tax is a sensible or politically possible policy, but at least it is possible to clarify the legal background.

The law governing a refuelling tax is complex, being subject to both EU and international law. But it is clear that changes have occurred at EU level in the last three years which now offer far greater opportunities for the implementation of a refuelling tax without the need for complicated international

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll