header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Katherine Dunseath , Richard Macrory
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Time to act

Should the UK be taxing aviation fuel, asks Katherine Dunseath and Richard Macrory

Aviation fuel is currently not taxed. Many have argued that taxation should be introduced as part of the policy response to climate change, but equally it is said that this is not something the UK could do on its own because of international legal constraints. Governments and industry sometimes disguise policy reluctance with the cloak of legal difficulties, and it is therefore important to unravel what a country such as the UK can or cannot do as a matter of law. It does not necessarily follow that aviation fuel tax is a sensible or politically possible policy, but at least it is possible to clarify the legal background.

The law governing a refuelling tax is complex, being subject to both EU and international law. But it is clear that changes have occurred at EU level in the last three years which now offer far greater opportunities for the implementation of a refuelling tax without the need for complicated international

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll