header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Katherine Dunseath , Richard Macrory
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Time to act

Should the UK be taxing aviation fuel, asks Katherine Dunseath and Richard Macrory

Aviation fuel is currently not taxed. Many have argued that taxation should be introduced as part of the policy response to climate change, but equally it is said that this is not something the UK could do on its own because of international legal constraints. Governments and industry sometimes disguise policy reluctance with the cloak of legal difficulties, and it is therefore important to unravel what a country such as the UK can or cannot do as a matter of law. It does not necessarily follow that aviation fuel tax is a sensible or politically possible policy, but at least it is possible to clarify the legal background.

The law governing a refuelling tax is complex, being subject to both EU and international law. But it is clear that changes have occurred at EU level in the last three years which now offer far greater opportunities for the implementation of a refuelling tax without the need for complicated international

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll