header-logo header-logo

20 April 2018 / Matt Bosworth
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Time to adopt a private prosecution policy?

nlj_7789_bosworth

Private prosecutions are taking off as a useful way to protect your brand & products, as Matt Bosworth explains

  • The era of the corporate Private Prosecution is firmly established.
  • An all-encompassing brand protection strategy is required in many industries.

The concept of the Private Prosecution, that is an action brought by a private individual, or entity who/which is not acting on behalf of the police or other prosecuting authority under section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, is not one that is new to the law in England and Wales, with those rights having been long established.

The use of Private Prosecutions has attracted interest from the business world because of the Metropolitan Police Crime Assessment Policy of 2017 that set out how the police may:

  • no longer investigate low level crimes including public order offences, shoplifting, and criminal damage under the value of £200
  • impose a 20 minute limit on examining CCTV for ‘petty’ crimes

These

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll