header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 April 2018 / Matt Bosworth
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Time to adopt a private prosecution policy?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7789_bosworth

Private prosecutions are taking off as a useful way to protect your brand & products, as Matt Bosworth explains

  • The era of the corporate Private Prosecution is firmly established.
  • An all-encompassing brand protection strategy is required in many industries.

The concept of the Private Prosecution, that is an action brought by a private individual, or entity who/which is not acting on behalf of the police or other prosecuting authority under section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, is not one that is new to the law in England and Wales, with those rights having been long established.

The use of Private Prosecutions has attracted interest from the business world because of the Metropolitan Police Crime Assessment Policy of 2017 that set out how the police may:

  • no longer investigate low level crimes including public order offences, shoplifting, and criminal damage under the value of £200
  • impose a 20 minute limit on examining CCTV for ‘petty’ crimes

These

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll