header-logo header-logo

Time to adopt a private prosecution policy?

20 April 2018 / Matt Bosworth
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7789_bosworth

Private prosecutions are taking off as a useful way to protect your brand & products, as Matt Bosworth explains

  • The era of the corporate Private Prosecution is firmly established.
  • An all-encompassing brand protection strategy is required in many industries.

The concept of the Private Prosecution, that is an action brought by a private individual, or entity who/which is not acting on behalf of the police or other prosecuting authority under section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, is not one that is new to the law in England and Wales, with those rights having been long established.

The use of Private Prosecutions has attracted interest from the business world because of the Metropolitan Police Crime Assessment Policy of 2017 that set out how the police may:

  • no longer investigate low level crimes including public order offences, shoplifting, and criminal damage under the value of £200
  • impose a 20 minute limit on examining CCTV for ‘petty’ crimes

These are just two examples of areas of re-deployment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll