header-logo header-logo

Time to be canny about cash flow

19 November 2018 / Norman Kenyon
Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
istock-136163689_2.jpg_image_for_vfs

Norman Kenvyn shares some tips on how to avoid stretched billing timescales

It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas, with festive food clogging up shop shelves and decorations starting to line the streets across the country.

For law firms, the mince pies and festive lights also herald potential interruptions to cash flow. If a law firm settles a case on 14 December, for example, it's unlikely to see any cash until some way into the new year.

If a law firm settles a case on the 21 December, where does that leave them? It’s unlikely to be able to get its hands on the cash until some way into the new year—all the costs draftsman will be wrapping their presents and hanging their stockings rather than stuck at their desks drawing up a bill of costs. It puts back cash flow calculations by a month, and the money they desperately need to bolster their cash reserves is out of reach.

Cash flow is seemingly an intractable problem for law firms,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll