header-logo header-logo

06 September 2018 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7807 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Time to be mindful

nlj_7807_wilding

Keith Wilding reviews the Mental Health Act & considers some ambitious proposals for a brighter future

  • Recognition of the need for resources.
  • Leading the way to social change.
  • Seeking to enhance the autonomy of the individual.
  • Linking future mental health provisions.
  • A single route of challenge to detention under the 1983 Act (potentially).

In October 2017 the prime minister commissioned an independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) to be chaired by Sir Simon Wessely, a past president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The terms of reference set out, among other things, the broad aim for people with mental health problems to be treated with dignity and for their liberty and autonomy to be protected as far as possible and to create ‘a forward looking plan of changes to legislation and practice, resulting in an enduring legacy of mental health support’. The Wessely review has recently published an interim report (‘The independent review of the Mental Health Act, Interim report’).

The review so

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll