header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Chris Gadd
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for change

What avenues are open for the intervened solicitor, asks Chris Gadd

This is the story of a solicitor who lost everything (let us call him X). In December 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) decided to intervene into X’s practice without any warning whatsoever. They convened their intervention committee in secret and presented to them a report that X had not seen. They prepared a draft resolution for the committee, a resolution that was adopted word for word. They then wrote to Barclays Bank and froze the practice bank accounts. Only then did they fax the intervention notice to X at 5.45pm.

The following morning, the SRA arrived at X’s office and took everything away. A week before Christmas he had to tell his staff that nobody would be paid, and that the firm had been forcibly closed. Then he had to go home to his family and ponder his future.

History

X’s “crime” was that he had briefly been a partner with a crooked solicitor at a previous firm, had reported that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll