header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Chris Gadd
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for change

What avenues are open for the intervened solicitor, asks Chris Gadd

This is the story of a solicitor who lost everything (let us call him X). In December 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) decided to intervene into X’s practice without any warning whatsoever. They convened their intervention committee in secret and presented to them a report that X had not seen. They prepared a draft resolution for the committee, a resolution that was adopted word for word. They then wrote to Barclays Bank and froze the practice bank accounts. Only then did they fax the intervention notice to X at 5.45pm.

The following morning, the SRA arrived at X’s office and took everything away. A week before Christmas he had to tell his staff that nobody would be paid, and that the firm had been forcibly closed. Then he had to go home to his family and ponder his future.

History

X’s “crime” was that he had briefly been a partner with a crooked solicitor at a previous firm, had reported that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll