header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Chris Gadd
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for change

What avenues are open for the intervened solicitor, asks Chris Gadd

This is the story of a solicitor who lost everything (let us call him X). In December 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) decided to intervene into X’s practice without any warning whatsoever. They convened their intervention committee in secret and presented to them a report that X had not seen. They prepared a draft resolution for the committee, a resolution that was adopted word for word. They then wrote to Barclays Bank and froze the practice bank accounts. Only then did they fax the intervention notice to X at 5.45pm.

The following morning, the SRA arrived at X’s office and took everything away. A week before Christmas he had to tell his staff that nobody would be paid, and that the firm had been forcibly closed. Then he had to go home to his family and ponder his future.

History

X’s “crime” was that he had briefly been a partner with a crooked solicitor at a previous firm, had reported that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll