header-logo header-logo

Time to change course?

02 May 2014 / Robert Postlethwaite
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
new_web_postlethwaite

Robert Postlethwaite looks at alternatives to traditional partnership & LLP ownership

 

For most law firms, the traditional partnership (or LLP) continues to be the ownership structure of choice, rewards of ownership being confined to a select group of lawyers who demonstrate stellar client service, outstanding ability to generate new business, effective team management, or sometimes more than one of the above.

Best model?

Is this the best model for all firms? We all know that a sea change is taking place in how legal services are delivered in the UK. ABS registrations are growing steadily; new equity-backed entrants are coming into the market; competition is intensifying and growing in sophistication. Thinly-capitalised law firms will be vulnerable to those which have equity backers willing to invest for the longer term. As if that wasn’t enough, tax changes are bringing to an end the self-employed status of many fixed share or salaried partners.

Any law firm weighing these threats might usefully consider whether a shift towards wider ownership and longer-term reward should form part of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll