header-logo header-logo

02 May 2014 / Robert Postlethwaite
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to change course?

new_web_postlethwaite

Robert Postlethwaite looks at alternatives to traditional partnership & LLP ownership

 

For most law firms, the traditional partnership (or LLP) continues to be the ownership structure of choice, rewards of ownership being confined to a select group of lawyers who demonstrate stellar client service, outstanding ability to generate new business, effective team management, or sometimes more than one of the above.

Best model?

Is this the best model for all firms? We all know that a sea change is taking place in how legal services are delivered in the UK. ABS registrations are growing steadily; new equity-backed entrants are coming into the market; competition is intensifying and growing in sophistication. Thinly-capitalised law firms will be vulnerable to those which have equity backers willing to invest for the longer term. As if that wasn’t enough, tax changes are bringing to an end the self-employed status of many fixed share or salaried partners.

Any law firm weighing these threats might usefully consider whether a shift towards wider ownership and longer-term reward should form part of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll