header-logo header-logo

17 October 2018
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Time to focus on quality not price

Legal regulators and the Legal Services Board should focus on quality of service as much as price, according to the Legal Services Consumer Panel. Although regulators have pursued price transparency for consumers, ‘price transparency without information on quality could mislead consumers to think that higher-priced services mean better quality,’ the Panel said this week. Sarah Chambers, chair of the Panel, said: ‘In-depth work must be done at regulatory level to ascertain which quality indicators are meaningful, how information should be collated, and crucially, how information should be presented to consumers.’

Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll