header-logo header-logo

Time for change?

17 November 2023 / Laura Rees
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
146617
Laura Rees suggests it’s time Parliament reviewed the Solicitors Act 1974 to give consumers & solicitors better protection
  • Payment for the purpose of s 70 of the Solicitors Act can include the transfer of money in satisfaction of a bill with the knowledge and consent of the client.
  • Consent can be given prior to the delivery of a bill and does not have to be a specific figure, and delivery takes place when the deduction is made.
  • Whether the client authorised the solicitor to recoup fees by way of a deduction from funds in hand ‘is a question of interpretation of the written contract of the retainer’.

In Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors [2023] EWCA Civ 844, the claimant, Menzies instructed Oakwood Solicitors in relation to a road traffic accident. Oakwood Solicitors acted under a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The substantive case was unremarkable, and damages were agreed with the defendant for £275,000. Following the agreement of damages, Oakwood Solicitors wrote to Menzies enclosing an interim statute bill showing their total costs,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll