header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Laura Rees
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Time for change?

146617
Laura Rees suggests it’s time Parliament reviewed the Solicitors Act 1974 to give consumers & solicitors better protection
  • Payment for the purpose of s 70 of the Solicitors Act can include the transfer of money in satisfaction of a bill with the knowledge and consent of the client.
  • Consent can be given prior to the delivery of a bill and does not have to be a specific figure, and delivery takes place when the deduction is made.
  • Whether the client authorised the solicitor to recoup fees by way of a deduction from funds in hand ‘is a question of interpretation of the written contract of the retainer’.

In Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors [2023] EWCA Civ 844, the claimant, Menzies instructed Oakwood Solicitors in relation to a road traffic accident. Oakwood Solicitors acted under a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The substantive case was unremarkable, and damages were agreed with the defendant for £275,000. Following the agreement of damages, Oakwood Solicitors wrote to Menzies enclosing an interim statute bill showing their total costs,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll