header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Laura Rees
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Time for change?

146617
Laura Rees suggests it’s time Parliament reviewed the Solicitors Act 1974 to give consumers & solicitors better protection
  • Payment for the purpose of s 70 of the Solicitors Act can include the transfer of money in satisfaction of a bill with the knowledge and consent of the client.
  • Consent can be given prior to the delivery of a bill and does not have to be a specific figure, and delivery takes place when the deduction is made.
  • Whether the client authorised the solicitor to recoup fees by way of a deduction from funds in hand ‘is a question of interpretation of the written contract of the retainer’.

In Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors [2023] EWCA Civ 844, the claimant, Menzies instructed Oakwood Solicitors in relation to a road traffic accident. Oakwood Solicitors acted under a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The substantive case was unremarkable, and damages were agreed with the defendant for £275,000. Following the agreement of damages, Oakwood Solicitors wrote to Menzies enclosing an interim statute bill showing their total costs,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll