header-logo header-logo

Time to get smart(er)

19 November 2015 / Greg Wildisen
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7677_wildisen

Can artificial intelligence ease legal aid pressure points? Greg Wildisen puts the case for technology

Legal aid was introduced in 1949. At that time nearly 80% of British people were eligible. Recently there have been hefty cuts to the system with another £220m expected to be cut each year until 2018. There is also a hike in the number of people seeking free legal assistance, with some pro bono organisations recording a 50% increase in requests for assistance in 2014–15. This leaves legal aid practitioners with the challenge of having to do more with less—less legal experts available to provide advice, and fewer resources to help with the growing demand to “push paper” around an inefficient system.

Artificial intelligence (AI), often referred to as cognitive computing, takes many forms, but most can be conveniently grouped into three broad areas: robotics; machine learning; and smart apps, previously referred to as expert systems.

Smart apps are technologies that connect complex content and expert analysis of that content to provide precise, immediate answers. These systems rather than being probabilistic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll