header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to level out justice

Legal aid & the provision of legal services to the public need to be restored & expanded, says Geoffrey Bindman

 

In the recent Supreme Court decision declaring the illegality of fees for employment tribunal claimants, Lord Reed articulated with matchless clarity the case for unimpeded access to the courts. Without it, ‘laws are liable to become a dead letter, the work done by parliament may be rendered nugatory, and the democratic election of members of parliament may become a meaningless charade’. All credit to the Supreme Court for their principled and effective intervention.

But the imposition of fees as a condition of access is sadly only one among several recent curbs on access to justice. The inaccessibility of necessary legal advice and representation can have even more drastic consequences than those described by Lord Reed. We know, for example, that residents at Grenfell Tower were long worried about fire risks. Access to legal advice might well have exposed regulatory breaches in time and prevented the tragic fire and loss

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll