header-logo header-logo

11 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time-limited Planning Chamber out for speedy consultation

The government wants to create a specialist planning court for judicial reviews on planning applications.
 

It believes the creation of a Specialist Planning Chamber in the Upper Tribunal, with its own judges and separate procedural rules setting specific time limits, will speed up the planning process.

The new chamber would build on a government initiative introduced in July in the Administrative Court, the Planning Fast-Track, which identifies planning related-reviews at an early stage and refers them on to judges with experience in the area. Stuart Andrews, partner at Eversheds, says: “We have been calling for a specialist court of this type for some time as it would ease delays that hold up major building projects.”

The speedy planning hub forms part of the Ministry of Justice’s current consultation, Judicial review: proposals for further reform, which is geared to cutting the number of judicial review applications. A record number of applications were lodged last year, mainly driven by a rise in immigration and asylum cases. And applications have doubled in number in the last six years, from 6,683 in 2007 to 12,434 in 2012, according to figures gathered by Sweet & Maxwell. More than three-quarters of these (9,469) relate to immigration or asylum.

Maurice Sunkin, Professor of Public Law and Socio-Legal Studies, University of Essex, says: “It’s not the growth in judicial review claims that is surprising and disconcerting. It is that beyond immigration, judicial review has not grown more. Despite apparent increases in levels of challenge, things are by no means as bad as they seem for the government. Planned reforms will divert substantial numbers of immigration and asylum cases towards immigration tribunals and away from the judicial review process.”

 

Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll