header-logo header-logo

Time-limited Planning Chamber out for speedy consultation

11 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government wants to create a specialist planning court for judicial reviews on planning applications.
 

It believes the creation of a Specialist Planning Chamber in the Upper Tribunal, with its own judges and separate procedural rules setting specific time limits, will speed up the planning process.

The new chamber would build on a government initiative introduced in July in the Administrative Court, the Planning Fast-Track, which identifies planning related-reviews at an early stage and refers them on to judges with experience in the area. Stuart Andrews, partner at Eversheds, says: “We have been calling for a specialist court of this type for some time as it would ease delays that hold up major building projects.”

The speedy planning hub forms part of the Ministry of Justice’s current consultation, Judicial review: proposals for further reform, which is geared to cutting the number of judicial review applications. A record number of applications were lodged last year, mainly driven by a rise in immigration and asylum cases. And applications have doubled in number in the last six years, from 6,683 in 2007 to 12,434 in 2012, according to figures gathered by Sweet & Maxwell. More than three-quarters of these (9,469) relate to immigration or asylum.

Maurice Sunkin, Professor of Public Law and Socio-Legal Studies, University of Essex, says: “It’s not the growth in judicial review claims that is surprising and disconcerting. It is that beyond immigration, judicial review has not grown more. Despite apparent increases in levels of challenge, things are by no means as bad as they seem for the government. Planned reforms will divert substantial numbers of immigration and asylum cases towards immigration tribunals and away from the judicial review process.”

 

Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll