header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010 / Richard Castle , John Castle
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Time to move on?

Richard Castle & John Castle believe it’s time leases moved with the times

“The length and complexity of modern leases is a scandal. Something ought to be done.” So began an article called Leases: time for change which appeared in the legal press on 3 July 1985. Sadly, much the same complaint can be made today. In 25 years, not much improvement has been made in the style, layout, language and design of most leases. Does that matter? We think it does, and that it is still worth investing time and effort in an attempt to bring leases into the 20th century before too much of the 21st goes by.
Advances since 1985

It’s certainly not been all doom and gloom. The Law Commission put its weight behind reform, and the Law Society has published a series of well-written business leases. The Code for Leasing Business Premises (2007) has become known and does a lot to redress the imbalance between landlord and tenant, and to cut down sterile negotiations on lease

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll