header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time for a new legal personality?

05_kidman_0

It could be time for a new legal category of ‘electronic person’ to help the law get to grips with new technology—just as the ‘corporate person’ was created in days gone by. ‘At first glance, it seems far-fetched (as perhaps did 'corporate persons' 400 years ago),’ concede David Kidman, partner at DWF, and Stephen Turner, legal director at DAC Beachcroft, in this week’s NLJ.

However, smart technology, the ‘internet of things’ where devices communicate with each other, and the use of artificial intelligence makes liability difficult to establish. An 'electronic person' would be a simple focal point to sue.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll