header-logo header-logo

05 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time is running out...

Law Society expresses alarm over Jackson timetable

The civil courts and the road traffic accident (RTA) portal need more time to prepare for the Jackson reforms, the Law Society has claimed in a plea for a deadline extension.

Law Society president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff warned the Ministry of Justice this week that rushing the implementation of Pt 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) risks creating extra costs and clogging up the courts.

Part 2 comes into force on 1 April 2013. The Law Society believes rushing the implementation could lead to “ambiguous and poorly considered” regulations, which in turn could result in “significant” satellite litigation.

Scott-Moncrieff pointed out that:

  • the necessary regulations and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules have yet to be published;
  • the RTA Portal Company has expressed doubts about its ability to meet the deadline requirements for employment liability and public liability claims, and the protocols for the process are not yet complete;
  • the rules governing qualified one-way costs shifting have yet to be approved;
  • implementation will require law firms to change case-management systems, work processes and business planning;
  • the Ministry of Justice has invited the Law Society for further discussions about the rules governing conditional fee arrangements and damages-based agreements, which suggests the regulations will not be available until early in the new year; and
  • there is a lack of clarity about the extent of the referral fee ban.

Scott-Moncrieff says: “Bringing all these complex changes into force on 1 April next year, in this rushed way and at breakneck speed, is a recipe for chaos.”

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and partner at Edwin Coe, says: “Many stakeholders like the Law Society have expressed deep concern that the implementation of Pt 2 of LASPO is being rushed through with unnecessary and even dangerous haste.

“The Ministry seems hell-bent on meeting its own deadline of April 2013. While practitioners understand the message of commitment to the Jackson reforms this brings, there is really substantial concern that the rushed implementation is going to lead to ill-considered conclusions and satellite litigation.”

Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll