header-logo header-logo

05 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time is running out...

Law Society expresses alarm over Jackson timetable

The civil courts and the road traffic accident (RTA) portal need more time to prepare for the Jackson reforms, the Law Society has claimed in a plea for a deadline extension.

Law Society president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff warned the Ministry of Justice this week that rushing the implementation of Pt 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) risks creating extra costs and clogging up the courts.

Part 2 comes into force on 1 April 2013. The Law Society believes rushing the implementation could lead to “ambiguous and poorly considered” regulations, which in turn could result in “significant” satellite litigation.

Scott-Moncrieff pointed out that:

  • the necessary regulations and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules have yet to be published;
  • the RTA Portal Company has expressed doubts about its ability to meet the deadline requirements for employment liability and public liability claims, and the protocols for the process are not yet complete;
  • the rules governing qualified one-way costs shifting have yet to be approved;
  • implementation will require law firms to change case-management systems, work processes and business planning;
  • the Ministry of Justice has invited the Law Society for further discussions about the rules governing conditional fee arrangements and damages-based agreements, which suggests the regulations will not be available until early in the new year; and
  • there is a lack of clarity about the extent of the referral fee ban.

Scott-Moncrieff says: “Bringing all these complex changes into force on 1 April next year, in this rushed way and at breakneck speed, is a recipe for chaos.”

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and partner at Edwin Coe, says: “Many stakeholders like the Law Society have expressed deep concern that the implementation of Pt 2 of LASPO is being rushed through with unnecessary and even dangerous haste.

“The Ministry seems hell-bent on meeting its own deadline of April 2013. While practitioners understand the message of commitment to the Jackson reforms this brings, there is really substantial concern that the rushed implementation is going to lead to ill-considered conclusions and satellite litigation.”

Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll