header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 June 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Time’s winged chariot

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
istock_000015145004medium

Do not delay in bringing judicial review proceedings, warns Nicholas Dobson

Take a large measure of public sector austerity, season generously with political philosophy and slow-cook for some years in a warm council decision oven to get a dish delicious to some, but distasteful to others. The chef in question was London Borough of Barnet. For on 6 December 2012 the council decided to implement a long-gestating policy to outsource a substantial variety of council services.

The resident claimant and others were concerned that if the council’s proposals were implemented they would “lead to a serious deterioration in the council’s services, partly...because they believe that private sector organisations cannot evince the public service ethos...so important in the delivery of the council’s service”.

However, as Underhill LJ pointed out in the Administrative Court on 29 April 2013 (R (Nash) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 1067 (Admin); [2013] All ER (D) 60 (May)): “It is not...for the court to decide whether those fears are justified. The decisions can only be challenged on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll