header-logo header-logo

Time to settle?

13 April 2018 / Julian Chamberlayne
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7788_chenberlayne

The discount rate: where have we got to & where are we going? Julian Chamberlayne

The Justice Select Committee is to be congratulated for causing the government to think more carefully about its proposed reforms to the discount rate. As a consequence we now have a commitment to call for more evidence, for further research and analysis by the Government Actuary Department (GAD) and to involve the expert panel at the first review, not just three years down the line. At the same time the Lord Chancellor is now committed to providing a far fuller explanation of the reasons for setting any new rate(s), including publishing the experts’ report and impact assessments. To ensure these commitments are not forgotten Schedule A1 to the Civil Liability Bill requires careful scrutiny and amendment, as for instance, it only requires publication of such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate.

We also have a clearer commitment for the review to consider differential rates, which ought to lead to lower rates for earnings-related heads of loss. Post Thompstone v Tameside

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll