header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to shape up?

Kerry Underwood recommends some summer reading & top tips for the new Lord Chancellor

Our new Lord Chancellor, David Lidington, faces an unenviable task in dealing with a civil justice system that is in serious difficulty. Low judicial morale and the related inability to recruit judges, stratospheric court fees and seemingly endless and disjointed reviews and reports, Brexit, and a legal profession close to despair are just some of the matters that will require his urgent attention. Here are a few ideas as to how matters could be improved.

Improvement matters

First, only the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and no other government department, should make proposals for reform of the justice system or the costs regime. Thus the Department of Health’s proposals regarding clinical negligence costs should be withdrawn and fed into Lord Justice Jackson’s recently published review of fixed costs. Anyone on the wrong end of costs orders thinks that they are too high. The Health Department is there to run the health service, not to determine the level of costs it should pay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll