header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 September 2013 / Daniel Gatty
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Time to sit up & take notice

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
istock_000016582578medium

If someone fails to buy land by the agreed date, when can the other party terminate the contract? Daniel Gatty reports

Failure to complete a contract to purchase land by the agreed date does not usually entitle the innocent party to terminate the contract immediately. Generally, there will be an express requirement to serve a notice to complete first. Will the innocent party always be able to terminate after serving a notice to complete? And when can the innocent party terminate without serving a notice to complete? These were the issues considered in Urban I (Blonk Street) Ltd v Ayres [2013] EWCA Civ 816.

Mr and Mrs Ayres agreed to buy an apartment in the claimant’s development off-plan. The contract did not fix a completion date for the development. It provided that when the building of the apartment was finished the developer would give notice; completion of the purchase was to take place within 10 days of service of that notice. There was no long-stop date for completion, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll