header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time to stop legal aid tendering process?

Law Society wants compensation for family legal aid firms

The Law Society has demanded an immediate halt to the legal aid tendering process after it emerged that almost half of firms providing family law services have lost their contracts.

The Law Society has written to the Legal Services Commission (LSC) and the government calling for the tendering process to be suspended while a public review is carried out to see whether areas around the country will have enough coverage.

Wales, the south-west, north-east and Leeds are believed to be particularly lacking in family legal aid provision.

The society is also calling for compensation for firms which have lost contracts, and is taking legal advice on whether it can bring a judicial review.
The LSC has confirmed that the number of family law providers has fallen by about 46%, from 2,400 to about 1,300.

Despite the figures, Carolyn Downs, LSC chief executive, has said a reduction of the supplier base was not an intended outcome of the tendering process.

Meanwhile, Law Society president, Linda Lee has accused the LSC of losing control of the tendering process. 

“The fall-out from these tenders will see almost 50% of firms previously doing legal aid work removed in a matter of a few weeks and this will impact on families and vulnerable people, preventing them access to vital legal services.

“The society is fully supportive of the need for quality standards in tendering. The implications of the LSC’s own surprise at the outcome is that skilled and talented lawyers who weeks ago delivered a quality service will now be prevented from helping those in need. When even the LSC itself is saying the outcome was not intended, and when clients are deprived of legal advice and services and firms are seeing important contracts vanish, the government has to take a closer look at this and make a decision.”

The society is surveying its members to find out which firms are affected.

Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll