header-logo header-logo

Time to take a back seat?

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels on older drivers—are they safe?

Today there are many more older drivers (for this purpose defined as over 70) than before, well over four million, and representing a bigger proportion of all drivers. Every three years older drivers submit a renewal form to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and answer the question: ‘Have you been told by a consultant or eye specialist that you have a problem with the field of vision?’ There is no legal obligation to have an eye test. They make a self-assessment, and answer that they do not have a problem. They may be lying, reckless, mistaken, or simply ignorant. Understandably, they wish to retain their licence. The DVLA can ask for an eye test, and for the result to be reported to them, but rarely does so.

Defects

The potential defects of older drivers are well known. They are slow to react, slow to meet a challenge, less confident. They may be under the influence of medication. Their physical frailty makes them more vulnerable to injury.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll