header-logo header-logo

Time ‘tight’ for end of furlough redundancies

27 September 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-detail
The furlough scheme will not be extended and is due to end on 31 October, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak confirmed last week

There had been rumours the Chancellor would continue with furlough to protect jobs after the government announced further pandemic restrictions.

Instead, there will be a new job support scheme (JSS) under which the government will top up salaries for six months from 1 November. Employee must work at least one-third of their normal hours, and the employer and government will each pay one-third of the wages for the hours not worked.

The government contribution will be capped at £697.92. The scheme is open to businesses with 250 employees or less, or to large businesses that can prove their revenue has fallen because of COVID-19.

Will Clayton, partner at employment law firm Constantine Law, said the timing of the Chancellor’s announcement on furlough meant ‘time is extremely tight’ for employers who need to make 20 or more redundancies. ‘For employers who may need to shed 100 or more currently furloughed employees, unless they have already started collective consultation with employee representatives, they will not be able to lawfully serve notices to dismiss until around mid-November at the earliest’.

Clayton said the Chancellor was ‘taking a real gamble’ with his job support scheme. ‘For example, will a restaurant that employs nine waiting staff put all of them on 33% of their hours and volunteer to share the costs of covering 66% of the shortfall with the government? Or will they instead make six members of staff redundant and keep three fully employed, without the costs of the JSS subsidy?’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll