header-logo header-logo

27 September 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-detail

Time ‘tight’ for end of furlough redundancies

The furlough scheme will not be extended and is due to end on 31 October, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak confirmed last week

There had been rumours the Chancellor would continue with furlough to protect jobs after the government announced further pandemic restrictions.

Instead, there will be a new job support scheme (JSS) under which the government will top up salaries for six months from 1 November. Employee must work at least one-third of their normal hours, and the employer and government will each pay one-third of the wages for the hours not worked.

The government contribution will be capped at £697.92. The scheme is open to businesses with 250 employees or less, or to large businesses that can prove their revenue has fallen because of COVID-19.

Will Clayton, partner at employment law firm Constantine Law, said the timing of the Chancellor’s announcement on furlough meant ‘time is extremely tight’ for employers who need to make 20 or more redundancies. ‘For employers who may need to shed 100 or more currently furloughed employees, unless they have already started collective consultation with employee representatives, they will not be able to lawfully serve notices to dismiss until around mid-November at the earliest’.

Clayton said the Chancellor was ‘taking a real gamble’ with his job support scheme. ‘For example, will a restaurant that employs nine waiting staff put all of them on 33% of their hours and volunteer to share the costs of covering 66% of the shortfall with the government? Or will they instead make six members of staff redundant and keep three fully employed, without the costs of the JSS subsidy?’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll