header-logo header-logo

27 September 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-detail

Time ‘tight’ for end of furlough redundancies

The furlough scheme will not be extended and is due to end on 31 October, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak confirmed last week

There had been rumours the Chancellor would continue with furlough to protect jobs after the government announced further pandemic restrictions.

Instead, there will be a new job support scheme (JSS) under which the government will top up salaries for six months from 1 November. Employee must work at least one-third of their normal hours, and the employer and government will each pay one-third of the wages for the hours not worked.

The government contribution will be capped at £697.92. The scheme is open to businesses with 250 employees or less, or to large businesses that can prove their revenue has fallen because of COVID-19.

Will Clayton, partner at employment law firm Constantine Law, said the timing of the Chancellor’s announcement on furlough meant ‘time is extremely tight’ for employers who need to make 20 or more redundancies. ‘For employers who may need to shed 100 or more currently furloughed employees, unless they have already started collective consultation with employee representatives, they will not be able to lawfully serve notices to dismiss until around mid-November at the earliest’.

Clayton said the Chancellor was ‘taking a real gamble’ with his job support scheme. ‘For example, will a restaurant that employs nine waiting staff put all of them on 33% of their hours and volunteer to share the costs of covering 66% of the shortfall with the government? Or will they instead make six members of staff redundant and keep three fully employed, without the costs of the JSS subsidy?’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll