header-logo header-logo

Time to give coroners’ reports more clout

01 December 2023 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Profession , Coronial law , Coroners
printer mail-detail
149228
It’s time for an independent body to ensure coroners’ recommendations are implemented, writes Veronica Cowan
  • Suggests ways to ensure coronial recommendations are followed and implemented.
  • Refers to recommendation by an Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody report for an independent body to ensure the implementation of coroners’ recommendations.

Following an inquest, coroners don’t reach a legally binding verdict in the way a jury in a criminal trial does. Nor is a binding judgment issued, as in a civil action. Instead, they can only issue prevention of future death (PFDs) reports if they have perceived evidence of failures leading to a death. The chief coroner’s guidance on such reports describes them as vitally important: ‘If society is to learn from deaths... a bereaved family wants to be able to say it was tragic and terrible, but at least it’s less likely to happen to somebody else.’

But evidence suggests that the preventative potential of such reports is not being fully realised, and some families have even criticised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll