header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Time to recognise the sovereignty of Parliament?

14457
Policy v principle: Dr Michael Arnheim puts the case for codification
  • Codification is not just parliamentary legislation but parliamentary legislation in a coherent, logical, predictable—and principled—framework.

The role of law in the UK—and with it the power of the judges—has grown hugely at the expense of government and politics over the past half century. As judges are unelected, virtually irremovable and accountable to nobody, this is a serious blow to democracy.

There is, according to Lord Sumption (a Justice of the UK Supreme Court (UKSC) from 2012 to 2018) a ‘persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’, leading to greatly enhanced power in the hands of unelected, irremovable and unaccountable judges. This is contrary to parliamentary sovereignty and democracy alike. This situation is connected with the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ identified by Lord Neuberger in the field of tort, but which is actually to be found more generally in UK law.

Solution

Yet a solution lies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll