header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Time to recognise the sovereignty of Parliament?

14457
Policy v principle: Dr Michael Arnheim puts the case for codification
  • Codification is not just parliamentary legislation but parliamentary legislation in a coherent, logical, predictable—and principled—framework.

The role of law in the UK—and with it the power of the judges—has grown hugely at the expense of government and politics over the past half century. As judges are unelected, virtually irremovable and accountable to nobody, this is a serious blow to democracy.

There is, according to Lord Sumption (a Justice of the UK Supreme Court (UKSC) from 2012 to 2018) a ‘persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’, leading to greatly enhanced power in the hands of unelected, irremovable and unaccountable judges. This is contrary to parliamentary sovereignty and democracy alike. This situation is connected with the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ identified by Lord Neuberger in the field of tort, but which is actually to be found more generally in UK law.

Solution

Yet a solution lies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll