header-logo header-logo

25 July 2019 / Dr John Fletcher
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to take the conflict resolution pledge?

John Fletcher expands on the benefits of CAP when dealing with conflicts in the construction industry

  • Conflict Avoidance Procedure: a new way of doing business and avoiding disputes.

We’ve had arbitration, adjudication and mediation in the construction and infrastructure sector for decades, and although they all work well, they also have their problems. All three need a clearly defined dispute, which means it has passed out of the hands of the project delivery team into the hands of the corporate lawyers. We lawyers are good at our job, and protect our clients by stopping any admissions being made and marshalling the facts into the straitjacket of pleadings and evidence. What this means in practice is that the focus moves from getting the job done on time and on budget, to winning the adjudication, arbitration or court case arising from the dispute.

Our outlook, quite properly, becomes retrospective as we prepare ourselves and our clients for legal processes in which the adjudicator, arbitrator or judge will look at two versions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll