header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010 / Hh Judge Platt
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A Titanic struggle

HH Judge Platt reports on the latest twists in the RTA claims industry

Lawyers who deal with motor accident claim cases will be well aware of the Titanic struggle which has now been raging for years between the motor insurance industry and the providers of vehicles for hire on credit to those whose cars have been damaged in road traffic accidents. Indeed claims for credit hire now form a significant part of the workload of the judges dealing with Fast Track trials.

Ingenious defence lawyers have continued to run various lines of defence against these claims. Equally ingenious claimant’s lawyers have been arguing for hire charges which usually dwarf the modest claims for whiplash injuries and in turn are sometimes dwarfed by the claims for costs. Most of these arguments are fact specific but most have been bitterly contested with what appears to be little sense of proportion on both sides and a surprising lack of realistic Part 36 offers. But these cases also give rise to important issues of law on which the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll