To ban or not to ban?

Neil Parpworth considers the decision to ban the Al Quds march & associated counter-protests

Looks at s 13, Public Order Act 1986, when and under what circumstances it is used, and the political and legal context around a recent ban on public processions in London.

Banning public processions is not a course of action which is often taken in England and Wales. Thus, writing in 1985, LH Leigh noted that ‘in the period from 1951 to 1979, only nine banning orders were made in England and Wales’. As he proceeded to observe, ‘the power to ban is obviously highly sensitive politically in a free society, and of this chief officers of police are well aware’: see Police Powers in England and Wales (1985, 2nd ed) Butterworths, p196.

Following the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, any proposed banning order is now potentially subject to legal challenge on the grounds that it represents a disproportionate and unreasonable interference with freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

To ban or not to ban?

Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights

Neil Parpworth considers the decision to ban the Al Quds march & associated counter-protests

Looks at s 13, Public Order Act 1986, when and under what circumstances it is used, and the political and legal context around a recent ban on public processions in London.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS

Read All

Costs judge within limits but litigants warned

A deputy costs judge correctly exercised his discretion to allow late service rather than strike out the point of dispute, the Court of Appeal has held

Prince Harry's claim falls short

Prince Harry, Baroness Doreen Lawrence and five others have lost their case against the publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline, in Various Claimants v Associated Newspapers [2026] EWHC 1637 (KB)

Making the case for open justice data

Public confidence in the justice system is being undermined by a lack of accessible, useable data, magistrates have warned

First immigration sentencing guidelines set out

The Sentencing Council has launched draft guidelines for facilitation and endangering another person during a sea crossing to the UK

Legal advice on workplace non-disclosure agreements

Government proposals to make independent written legal advice a prerequisite for workplace non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) may prove unworkable, according to a senior employment lawyer

Error message

To ban or not to ban?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Sidley—Carl Hotton