To ban or not to ban?

Neil Parpworth considers the decision to ban the Al Quds march & associated counter-protests

Looks at s 13, Public Order Act 1986, when and under what circumstances it is used, and the political and legal context around a recent ban on public processions in London.

Banning public processions is not a course of action which is often taken in England and Wales. Thus, writing in 1985, LH Leigh noted that ‘in the period from 1951 to 1979, only nine banning orders were made in England and Wales’. As he proceeded to observe, ‘the power to ban is obviously highly sensitive politically in a free society, and of this chief officers of police are well aware’: see Police Powers in England and Wales (1985, 2nd ed) Butterworths, p196.

Following the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, any proposed banning order is now potentially subject to legal challenge on the grounds that it represents a disproportionate and unreasonable interference with freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

To ban or not to ban?

Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights

Neil Parpworth considers the decision to ban the Al Quds march & associated counter-protests

Looks at s 13, Public Order Act 1986, when and under what circumstances it is used, and the political and legal context around a recent ban on public processions in London.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS

Read All

The LexisNexis Legal Aid Deserts Report 2026

Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice

SRA sounds warning over AI misuse as reports & investigations mount

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality

NLJ this week Civil way: Practical procedure lessons & cautionary tales

From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

NLJ this week: Fraud in the digital age

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

NLJ this week: Right outcome, troubling reasoning?

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct?

Error message

To ban or not to ban?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei